Evaluation of Industrial Effluent Treatment Performance and Regulatory Compliance: Implications for Surface and Groundwater Quality in Agro and Leather-Based Industries
Keywords:
Distillery wastewater, Effluent Treatment Plant, Leather industry effluent, Sugar industry, Zero Liquid DischargeAbstract
The present study investigates the treatment efficiency and regulatory compliance of effluents generated by the sugar factory and distillery and leather-based industries, with implications for surface and groundwater quality. Significant variation in physicochemical characteristics and treatment performance was observed industries. In the sugar factory effluent, notable reductions were achieved with BOD decreasing from 1100 to 70 mg/L (93.6%), COD from 2100 to 320 mg/L (84.8%), and TDS from 5000 to 180 mg/L (96.4%), while TSS removal remained limited at 20%. The distillery effluent treated through a Continuous Processing Unit (CPU) exhibited high efficiency, with COD and TDS reduced from 2500 to 90 mg/L (96.4%) and pH adjusted from 3.3 to 7.5, indicating effective neutralization and pollutant removal. In contrast, leather industry effluent showed poor compliance with discharge standards, as outlet values of TDS (9450 mg/L), COD (2763 mg/L), hardness (1080 mg/L), and alkalinity (1365 mg/L) exceeded permissible limits, reflecting inadequate treatment performance. Heavy metal evaluation suggested elevated concentrations in the leather industry influent, particularly chromium (0.915 mg/L), lead (0.200 mg/L), cadmium (0.065 mg/L), arsenic (0.250 mg/L), and mercury (0.295 mg/L), with only partial reduction at outlet. Sugar factory effluent showed substantial decline in chromium (0.149 to 0.012 mg/L), copper (0.460 to 0.002 mg/L), and lead (0.066 to 0.005 mg/L), whereas distillery effluent exhibited an unexpected increase in chromium (0.046 to 0.283 mg/L). Overall, while progress has been made in improving wastewater management within the sugar and distillery sectors, the leather industry continues to exert considerable pressure on regional water resources.Downloads
References
Aryanfar, Y., Keçebaş, A., Hassanzadeh, S., Sadabad, A. N., Rashid, F. L., Ahmad, S., ... & Alcaraz, J. L. G. (2025). Integrated Evaluation of Contaminant Profiles, Detection Techniques, and Management Strategies for tannery Sludge. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1932-2143. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.70191
Awasare, S. D., Bhosale, H. U., & Chavan, N. P. (2015). Effluent treatment plant of sugar wastewater–A review. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 1(5), 102-107.
Bhattacharya, A. K., & Roy, S. N. (2022). Wastewater management and treatment technologies with recycling and reuse issues in India leading to zero liquid discharge (ZLD). In Wastewater assessment, treatment, reuse and development in India, pp. 125-157. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95786-5_7
Igbinosa, E. O., & Okoh, A. I. (2009). Impact of discharge wastewater effluents on the physico-chemical qualities of a receiving watershed in a typical rural community. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 6(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327619
Kushwaha, J. P. (2015). A review on sugar industry wastewater: sources, treatment technologies, and reuse. Desalination and Water Treatment, 53(2), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.838526
Magat, W. A., & Viscusi, W. K. (1990). Effectiveness of the EPA's regulatory enforcement: The case of industrial effluent standards. The Journal of Law and Economics, 33(2), 331-360. https://www.jstor.org/stable/725367
Mohanavelu, A., Naganna, S., & Al-Ansari, N. (2021). Irrigation Induced Salinity and Sodicity Hazards on Soil and Groundwater: An Overview of Its Causes, Impacts and Mitigation Strategies. Agriculture, 11(10), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100983.
Ndubuisi, O. G., & FNisafety, E. (2025). Global Best Practices of Advanced Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). International Journal of Innovative Environmental Studies Research, 13(4), 53-65.
Pant, D., & Adholeya, A. (2007). Biological approaches for treatment of distillery wastewater: a review. Bioresource technology, 98(12), 2321-2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.027
Priyan, K. (2021). Issues and challenges of groundwater and surface water management in semi-arid regions. Groundwater resources development and planning in the semi-arid region, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68124-1_1
Rahaman, T. (2025). Smart environmental monitoring systems for air and water quality management. American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions, 1(01), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.63125/a08zay47
Sarker, B., Keya, K. N., Mahir, F. I., Nahiun, K. M., Shahida, S., & Khan, R. A. (2021). Surface and ground water pollution: causes and effects of urbanization and industrialization in South Asia. Scientific Review, 7(3), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.32861/sr.73.32.41
Shang, Y., Wang, Y., Huang, J., Shi, J., Xu, L., Li, K., Jin, P., & Jin, X. (2025). A novel strategy for simultaneous removal of hardness, suspended solids and organics from fracturing wastewater: Efficiency, mechanism and application. Separation and Purification Technology, 366, 132735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132735.
Tadesse, G. L., Guya, T. K., & Walabu, M. (2017). Impacts of leather industry effluent on environments and human health: a review article. Advances in Life Science and Technology, 54(10), 58-67.
Zhang, C., Li, S., Sun, H., Li, X., Fu, L., Zhang, C., Sun, S., & Zhou, D. (2024). Assessing the impact of low organic loading on effluent safety in wastewater treatment: Insights from an activated sludge reactor study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 465, 133083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133083.
Zhang, C., Lin, J., Jia, X., & Peng, B. (2016). A salt-free and chromium discharge minimizing tanning technology: the novel cleaner integrated chrome tanning process. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132735
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 © Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
